<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Abstract journalism</title>
	<atom:link href="http://katekendall.com/2009/12/17/abstract-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://katekendall.com/2009/12/17/abstract-journalism/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 19:18:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate Kendall</title>
		<link>http://katekendall.com/2009/12/17/abstract-journalism/#comment-77</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kate Kendall]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 00:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://katekendall.com/?p=164#comment-77</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Brodaigh – I&#039;ve been loving your comments! And thank you for spending some time even bothering to visit me. Last night, I was feeling a bit blah and read your message on my happiness post and it pumped me up, so every comment is appreciated!

I&#039;m also extremely flattered that you (or the dream you!) thought the illustration was brilliant. I could talk for hours about it...

I like your idea of turning it upside down – in fact, it works quite well. If you want to create or investigate a story (or &#039;the zeitgeist&#039;), you can go out and research the leads to make it happen. The only problem with the reverse funnel is that there might be a risk of missing some info that is critical to the story. Of course, the extreme of this is the current-affair-style TV journalism!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brodaigh – I&#8217;ve been loving your comments! And thank you for spending some time even bothering to visit me. Last night, I was feeling a bit blah and read your message on my happiness post and it pumped me up, so every comment is appreciated!</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also extremely flattered that you (or the dream you!) thought the illustration was brilliant. I could talk for hours about it&#8230;</p>
<p>I like your idea of turning it upside down – in fact, it works quite well. If you want to create or investigate a story (or &#8216;the zeitgeist&#8217;), you can go out and research the leads to make it happen. The only problem with the reverse funnel is that there might be a risk of missing some info that is critical to the story. Of course, the extreme of this is the current-affair-style TV journalism!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me again again again</title>
		<link>http://katekendall.com/2009/12/17/abstract-journalism/#comment-76</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[me again again again]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 23:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://katekendall.com/?p=164#comment-76</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I actually had a dream this illustration was brilliant. Sound crazy? anyway I tweeted it but you may have missed it.  Looking at it now it even reflects the direction well. I measure intelligence by &#039;the filter&#039;. It is without a doubt a strange and complex world we live in. I wonder what would happen if you turned it upside down.
ps I hope you don&#039;t mind me commenting on ur blog.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually had a dream this illustration was brilliant. Sound crazy? anyway I tweeted it but you may have missed it.  Looking at it now it even reflects the direction well. I measure intelligence by &#8216;the filter&#8217;. It is without a doubt a strange and complex world we live in. I wonder what would happen if you turned it upside down.<br />
ps I hope you don&#8217;t mind me commenting on ur blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clare Lancaster</title>
		<link>http://katekendall.com/2009/12/17/abstract-journalism/#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Clare Lancaster]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Dec 2009 04:46:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://katekendall.com/?p=164#comment-52</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes. Love your graph and love this topic. 

First started thinking about this after listening to a Gary Vaynerchuk talk about information D.J&#039;s. 

There&#039;s so much content available - how do you find a reliable way to filter it?

Sure there is search, directories and social networks to help but there&#039;s definitely a need to focus on specific themes with person opinion - to distil it all and present the best info. 

I&#039;ve been thinking about this for a while - I started off with a weekly email wrap up of &quot;good&quot; online business. I&#039;ve taken this further with daily updates on womeninbusiness.com.au. 

Definitely an area to watch and fun to be involved in.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes. Love your graph and love this topic. </p>
<p>First started thinking about this after listening to a Gary Vaynerchuk talk about information D.J&#8217;s. </p>
<p>There&#8217;s so much content available &#8211; how do you find a reliable way to filter it?</p>
<p>Sure there is search, directories and social networks to help but there&#8217;s definitely a need to focus on specific themes with person opinion &#8211; to distil it all and present the best info. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been thinking about this for a while &#8211; I started off with a weekly email wrap up of &#8220;good&#8221; online business. I&#8217;ve taken this further with daily updates on womeninbusiness.com.au. </p>
<p>Definitely an area to watch and fun to be involved in.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

